| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Schmidberger v Austria ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Schmidberger v Austria
''Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v Austria'' (2003) (C-112/00 ) is an EU law case, concerning the free movement of goods in the European Union.
==Facts==
Schmidberger, who ran a trucking company, claimed damages for loss caused by a protest group that had prevented it taking goods to Austria by lorry. Transitforum Austria Tirol organised a demonstration to block the Brenner Autobahn, A13, a transit between Northern Europe and Italy. It did so for 30 hours, in protest against the environment and health problems from the increase in movement of heavy goods on the motorway.
==Judgment==
The Court of Justice held that Austria’s failure to ban the demonstration infringed article 34 and 35, and TEU art 4(3). However this was justified by the fundamental right of demonstrators to freedom of expression and assembly under the ECHR, national constitution and principles that were an integral part of EU law. Human rights were a fundamental principle in EU law, and free expression and association among the ‘fundamental pillars of a democratic society’. They could only be restricted if ‘the restrictions in fact correspond to objectives of general interest and do not, taking account of the aim of the restrictions, constitute disproportionate and unacceptable interference, impairing the very substance of the rights guaranteed.’
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Schmidberger v Austria」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|